AJNorth Wine Column for 10/21/04
Some Thoughts On Two Buck Chuck
Over the last two years, I've repeatedly been asked by people
who know of my interest
in wine "What do you think of Two Buck Chuck?"
With the recent opening of Trader Joe's in
Santa Fe, that query to me has ballooned. My standard response
is "Like people...it is what
it is". So, exactly, what IS 2$Chuck??
Back in 1974, a man named Charles Shaw had a passion for
producing Gamay Beaujolais
wine in California. To this end, he largely succeeded...it
was probably the best California
Gamay produced until recently. Alas, the marketplace didn't
share his passion for the genre.
Following his divorce in 1991, Shaw sold the label and his
winery in the Napa Valley to
Fred Franzia, where it lay dormant for ten years.
Fast forward to 2002. Because of overplanting of grapes,
especially in the
interior San Joaquin Valley, home of California's bulk,
box and jug wines; the state is
awash in cheap wine. Especially Bronco Wine Company, the
5'th largest wine company in the US,
whose annual wine sales total nearly 20 million cases. What
was a wine manufacturer
to do?? Franzia, one of the more astute businessmen around,
had an idea.
He made the Trader Joe's Market chain in California an offer
they couldn't refuse. He'd
bottle the wine under a classy name, reviving the Charles
Shaw label, and sell it to them for
a song. TJ's priced it at $1.99/btl, the cheapest a US wine
has ever sold, and the stuff
started flying out the door by the caseload.
The 2$Chuck phenomenon was born. Both TJ's and Franzia were
taken by surprise at the public
response. And they both have been laughing all the way to
the bank ever since.
So...what IS 2$Chuck. It is inexpensive wine, primarily
or exclusively (no one but Franzia
knows) from San Joaquin vineyards, cropped at huge tonnage
levels. It comes in five different
varietial flavors. It comes from Bronco's huge wine manufacturing
plants in Ceres and Escalon,
California. It is blended from hundreds of different lots
to give a consistent character from
batch to batch; not an easy task.
The Charles Shaw label indicates a Napa address; to give
it a certain cachet. The closest
the wine has been to the Napa Valley is when the tanker
truck pulls up in the dead of night to
offload its cargo at the huge Bronco bottling facility in
the industrial park near the airport
on the south edge of town. By the next day, it's bottled,
being loaded onto transport trucks
and out the door. Not unlike locating a flea market next
to a world-class opera; the guile
of Franzia's scheme makes the Napa Valley-ites absolutely
livid.
When the 2$Chuck phenomenon burst upon the scene two years
ago, it received a lot of popular
press. Everybody was hot to try this new wine. Most serious
wine connoisseurs made an effort
to try them. Most, like me, sorta shrugged their shoulders
and thought "what's all the
buzz about?". Yet, the continued strong sales for 2$Chuck
clearly indicate there is a
segment of the market receiving pleasure from that wine.
I've found it rather amusing the strong negative reaction
the wine elicits from wine
connoisseurs. They universally diss the wine. Yet most have
made the effort to try it.
Snobbism and elitism?? Perhaps, but I don't think so. Sort
of like people who read the New York
Times or the Wall Street Journal... they would never acknowledge
to reading the National Inquirer.
Yet who amongst us cannot resist stealing a glance at the
rag standing at the grocery
checkout line??
So... what do I think of 2$Chuck? It's a perfectly well-made
wine. It has no flaws that I would
say. It's balanced and has some grapey fruit. It displays
a bit of varietal character.
It even displays some "terroir"; a bit of that
earthiness you get from hot-climate grapes.
Of the five varietals, the Shiraz is probably the best.
So... would I drink 2$Chuck? Probably not; not on a regular
basis. My problem with the line
is that I find the wines incredibly boring and simple. I
tried to take notes on the wines once
and failed. I couldn't come up with anything in the way
of descriptors other than "grapey".
The wines offer me little in the way of interest or intellectual
appeal. I would much rather
spend three or four times as much and get a wine that speaks
to me of something more than just
"grapey". And the small amount of residual sugar
makes them a bit tiring on the palate.
That being said, there IS a place for 2$Chuck. I can envision
myself tucking into a
hamburger or a burrito and finding a glass of 2$Chuck Shiraz
just the ticket to wash it down.
Wine doesn't always have to be serious and contemplative.
A simple salad lunch with a friend,
where the company and the conversation are the focus; a
glass of 2$Chuck Chardonnay could fill
the bill quite nicely, thank you.
The 2$Chuck phenomena has an up-side. It has restrained
the prices on the lower end of the
wine market. It has spawned a few copycats; like the Pacific
Peak and Summerfield line from
Golden State Vintners, the 15'th largest wine company in
the US. It has undoubtedly drawn some
people to drinking wine on a regular basis; people who would
otherwise have soft-drinks or beer.
The economics behind 2$Chuck are interesting.... and that's
what 2$Chuck is all about. To put
out a wine that sells for $2, and make a small profit; it
is estimated that you must pay about
$200/ton for the grapes. Last year, San Joaquin wine grapes
were averaging about $60/ton. So,
even though the vineyard acreage there is contracting, it
would appear that 2$Chuck will
continue for the foreseeable future... assuming sales remain
strong.
So...what do I REALLY think about 2$Chuck?? I think the
wine world and American consumers
are much better off for it and owe Fred Franzia and Trader
Joe's a big "thank you". It may not be
a wine that'll appear on my table; but there are a lot of
people out there who ARE getting a
great deal of enjoyment from the wine. How bad could that
be??
_______________________________________
November 15 is the traditional day for the release of the
Beaujolais Noveau, amid much hoopla
in the bistros of Paris, where they will argue the merits
of this year's wine into the wee hours
of the morning...fueled by tumbler after tumbler of the
stuff. The wine is never anything to get
excited about, winewise. It's all about the celebration
and knocking back glassfuls of it with
friends and good bistro fare.
One of the things many of us miss about the passing of Cafe
Escalera was their annual
Beaujolais dinner. The wine was always plentiful and...OK.
The food and the festivities...
nonpareil. Brian Knox is behind the stove again at Aqua
Santa and serving some of the best
bistro-style food in New Mexico. He plans to resume the
Beaujolais Noveau dinner this year at
his new digs on Alameda Street. It should be a great party,
so keep your eyes peeled for its
announcement.
_______________________________________
Wine of the Month: Maryhill Columbia Valley Syrah 2001:
Syrah, the red grape of France's
Northern Rhone, has made enormous strides in California
over the last 10-15 years. It has started
to really take off in the Pacific Northwest over the last
few years, displaying some of the same
terroir-driven roasted/espresso character you get in France's
finest.
This example, from a small winery in the western end of
the Columbia Valley, is everything you'd
want in a Syrah. It has loads of ripe/juicy boysenberry/framboise
Syrah fruit with some of that
pungent/roasted mineral character that makes Washington
Syrahs so intriguing. Reasonably
priced at $20 and the equal of many Syrahs twice that price.
_______________________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
AJNorth Wine Column for 11/18/04
Screwcaps and Corks: A Continuing Saga
The bane of any wine lover is to pull the cork on a special
bottle, usually with a group
of friends waiting in eager anticipation, taking that first
whiff of the nose, and finding
the wet cardboard/damp basement aroma of a "corked"
wine. It happens far too often in my book.
The source of a "corked" wine is well known. Wines
are usually sealed by a plug of wood
from the bark of the cork tree, typically Portuguese or
Spanish in origin. Near the base of
tree, various kinds of fungi grow in this bark. When these
fungi interact with the chlorine
compounds used to sterilize and bleach these corks, a (harmless)
chemical known as 2,4,6-
trichloroanisole, usually termed TCA, is formed.
The effect of this TCA in wine is twofold. It imparts a
characteristic stench to the wine
and it robs the wine of its fruitiness, suppressing the
wine's natural aroma. The nose is
incredibly sensitive to the smell of TCA; oftentimes to
levels of only a few parts per trillion.
It is estimated that roughly 5%-8% of all commercial, cork-finished,
wines are TCA-tainted.
If Toyota automobiles or Maytag washers had that failure
rate, they'd soon be driven
from the marketplace.
What to do to solve this problem?? The Portuguese cork industry
has been investing heavily
in methods to eradicate the problem. Thus far, a solution
has eluded them.
There have been a number of plastic cork substitutes developed.
One brand, the SupremeCorq,
is so lacking in resiliency that it can actually damage
your corkscrew in removing them. Worse,
they often come in really garish colors. Another brand,
the NeoCork, is far superior. It has a
soft, spongy interior with a firm, slickish outer layer
that makes its removal far easier.
Although the performance of plastic corks for long-term
storage has not been substantiated,
they resemble cork closures enough that most traditionalist
wine lovers have been accepting of
their usage in fine wines.
Fortunately (and unfortunately), the ultimate solution for
TCA-tainted wines is well in hand...
the screwcap closure. This market is dominated by the Stelvin
closure; a French product that
was first developed back in the late 1950's. The Stelvin
is a thin aluminum sleeve that fits
over the neck of the bottle, with a thin resilient foam-plastic
disk, coated with an impervious,
silvery Mylar-like coating fitting inside where it contacts
the wine. When the top is unscrewed,
the sleeve separates from the screwtop with a characteristic
snapping sound.
One of the long-held wine myths is that the development
of the bouquet in a wine as
it ages in the bottle is the result of a slow, gentle oxidation
as the wine "breathes"
in air through the pores of the cork. This is utter nonsense;
a sound cork
will permit virtually zero ingress of air from the outside.
Technically speaking, bottle bouquet
is the result of "reductive" (absence of oxygen)
conditions inside the bottle, rather than
oxidative conditions. The more hermetic the seal, the better.
This airtight seal is, in fact, the strength of the Stelvin
closure. Corks sometimes leak
around the edges; allowing wine out and air in. This is
seldom the case with a properly-formed
Stelvin. Repeated studies have shown that, in the case of
aromatic white wines, the Stelvin
far outperforms the cork in preserving the freshness in
the wine over the course of years....
many years.
So, it is becoming much more common in the marketplace to
see wines, increasingly fine wines,
sold with a screwtop. Much of this impetus has come from
the New Zealand and Australian wine
industry; who have been embracing screwcaps with a vengeance.
The California and
European industries have been far slower to make the switch.
So...if the screwcap has been demonstrated to be a far superior
technical solution to the
corked wine problem (and it has), why has it taken over
40 years to become more commonplace
but, even yet, the chosen closure for only a small segment
of the market?? Why are
corks still the preferred closure, even with an appalling
failure rate??
The answer, in a nutshell, is tradition and image. Wine
lovers are some of the most hidebound,
stodgy, resistant-to-change, folks in the world. To their
minds, the "pop" of a cork coming out
of a bottle conveys the image of "quality". To
them, the "crackle/snap" of rending aluminum on
opening a Stelvin-sealed wine shouts of "cheap".
For many of them, the 5%-8% failure rate of
corks is simply an overhead cost of their wine passion.
A cost that more and more winemakers
are deciding to no longer accept.
Over the last few years, many winemakers have been taking
a hard look at alternativeclosures.
Even as far back as the '70's, the venerable Bordeaux Chateau
Haut-Brion experimented
with the Stelvin; but abandoned the work because of image
issues. Recently, the irrepressible
Randall Grahm went to Stelvins for his entire line of Bonny
Doon wines. David Cofarro Winery in
Healdsburg now offers his futures buyers their choice of
NeoCork or Stelvin. Clearly, screwcaps
are making inroads into the higher-end of the wine market.
There are some real problems with a wholesale adoption of
screwcaps. Vintners must
modify their winemaking techniques to allow for the no-oxygen
environment under a
Stelvin. The sharp edges of the Stelvin cap can cut fingers
if one is careless. Most
amusing to me: Some waiters in snooty restaurants appear
a bit flummoxed when required
to open a screwcapped wine, no matter what its pedigree.
They view it as akin to being requested
to crack a bottle of Thunderbird so the customer can swig
directly from the bottle; below their
professional image. Do they present the screwcap to the
diner for sniffing for corkiness, or
quietly slip it into their pocket??
Despite these problems, both practical and image, it seems
clear that screwcaps are going to
become a larger fixture on the wine scene as more vintners
and, more
importantly, consumers refuse to tolerate the failure rate
of cork-closed wines. The
"crackle-snap" of a Stelvin being opened may become
the same music to a wine-lover's
ear as the "pop" of the cork.
_______________________________________
Today, November 18, is the release date for the 2004 Beaujolais
Noveau. The wine is nothing
to get excited about. The celebration is. Brain Knox will
be doing a Beaujolais Celebration
this Thursday, Friday, and Saturday at his Aqua Santa restaurant;
featuring cassoulet, white
truffles, and traditional French bistro-type fare.... a
bit of Paris right here in Santa Fe...
without the attitude.
_______________________________________
Although Canyon Road's Geronimo restaurant moves more wine
than any other restaurant in
New Mexico; they have never officially done a winemaker's
dinner. That is about to change
when they host their first on Thursday, Dec.2 Featured will
be Merry Edwards, a lady
whose skillful touch with Pinot Noir in California is legendary.
Chef Eric DeStefano has
fashioned a five course meal to accompany her wines.
_______________________________________
The brochure for next year's Taos Winter Wine Festival (January
19-30) has just appeared
and the program posted on the WebSite (www.SkiTaos.Org).
_______________________________________
Wine Of The Month: LaVielleFerme VF "Lasira" 2002:
From the Costieres de Nimes region of
Southern France; the wine is produced by the Perrin family
of Chateau de Beaucastel fame.
Per the back label; the wine is 75% Syrah, 25% Grenache,
and 0% Cork... it is closed with
a Stelvin.
Nearly black in color, the nose shouts of blackberry/Syrah
and strawberry/Grenache with that
slight minerally/gamey character of the Southern Rhone.
On the palate, the fruit is subsumed
by a hard/tannic/minerally bite that lends a rough/rustic
character to the wine. It's a wine
that cries out for a hearty dish like cassoulet or pisaladiere.
It's a steal at $8. I wouldn't
be surprised if it ages into something really interesting
over 2-6 year's time. And you won't have
to worry about it being "corked".
_______________________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
Older Equals Better?? : Don't Count On It
Well... maybe older IS better when it comes to Christmas
fruitcake; but when it
comes to wine, it happens less often then many of us would
care to admit. The offer
from a longtime friend to stop by for a taste Thanksgiving
afternoon of a '61 Latour,
a legendary wine in its time, caused me to ponder the subject
of aged wines for this
month's column.
When many start to get interested in wine, and begin reading
voraciously on the
subject; one reads great, florid prose penned by iconic
wine writers, usually British,
praising the glories of old or ancient wines they have drunk,
usually French Claret
(red Bordeaux) from Grand Cru Classe growths.
We start to collect potential agers, laying them away, with
dreams of years from
now having a similar orgasmic experience. Alas, all too
often, our best laid plans
"oft gang aglee".
So...what does one look for in a well-aged wines and how
does one predict, exactly,
what wines to lay down for aging? Unfortunately, there are
no pat, formulaic answers
to either question. But I'll blunder ahead and offer up
some thoughts on the subject.
Most people, in trying aged wines (here we're talking about
wines 10...20...40 years
old), worship at the alter of "complexity". Alas,
complexity in wine,
like beauty in people, is danged difficult to define, though
easily recognized. Roughly
speaking, it is layer upon layer of different smells and
flavors that you CAN get in
an aged wine. A young wine may be more like Def Leopard,
an old wine like Mozart.
Oftentimes, these complexities can be frustratingly transient.
You can open and pour
an old wine and it just smells tired and musty in the glass.
Return to it an hour later
and you may find amazing aromas have blossomed out of nowhere.
Oftentimes, it can be
the opposite. The wine will have a beautiful complex nose
out the chute, and 15-20
minutes later, it'll be totally shot.. a tired hollow shell
of its old self.
One of the great myths of old wines: "this wine has
turned to vinegar and is only
suitable for salad dressing". The anaerobic conditions
found in a well-sealed bottle, and
the absence of acetobacter bacteria that is necessary to
form acetic acid, preclude an
old/sound wine from turning to vinegar in the bottle. Using
old wine for dressing is
a sure formula for ruining some perfectly good greens.
The appreciation of old/mature wines is very much a learned
experience. If you are
used to drinking young, fruit dominated, perhaps tannic,
Zinfandels; and then are
poured an old Ridge Geyserville Zinfandel 1973; it's not
likely to be an eye-opening
exposure to old wines. However, if you learned wines in
the old-boy's clubs of London,
drinking 20 year old classic Clarets, and listening to these
old British curmudgeons,
waxing rhapsodically, in their funny accents, about the
glories of this '82 Chateau Gloria;
you'll probably find a young MonteBello Cabernet a crude
and brutish rendition of that
grape.
In my experience with older wines; what I'll often find
is a nose with beautiful/
complex aromatics. But on the palate, it can often be devoid
of fruit, lacking in lushness,
and somewhat harsh and astringent...dried out is the term
I often use. Such wines can be
called a great intellectual experience, but often not a
pleasurable sensual experience.
Sometimes, having food with such a wine is a waste. Other
times, the food actually
knocks back the astringent tannins and makes it great to
drink.
However..... there are those rare wines where, as the fruit
starts to fade, the
tannins start to subside, and the complexity comes to the
forefront; when the stars and
planets are in perfect alignment; you achieve this cosmic
convergence of a fully mature
wine at its peak of sublime perfection. The experience can
only be described as
"otherworldly". THEN you know what all the whoop-de-doo
is about.
So....how to identify a young wine worth putting down for
aging?? If I
had a pat answer to that question, I wouldn't be doing physics
for my day job (that's not
really so)!! Certainly, in red wines, the existence of ample
tannins, dark color, and
plenty of lush fruit are necessary..though NOT a guarantee.
I've laid down any number of
Italian Dolcettos that meet the criteria. And, ten years
down the road, they have all
the spunk of a 40 year old NBA star with creaky knees. Two
other necessary
qualities in ageable red wines are "balance" and
"structure"; again, pretty elusive to
define but, sometimes, easily recognizable.
The folklore is that white wines are always drunk in their
youth. Surprisingly, there
are a LOT of white wines that DO take to aging quite well.
One of the prime criteria for
ageable whites is high acidity. A teeth-jarring, bone-chattering
acidity in a white
will often yield a beautiful complex wine 10-20 years down
the road. Truth be known,
I find it far easier to select ageable whites than I do
reds.
The action of acids on various alcohols, under anaerobic
conditions found in bottled
wine, produce chemicals known as esthers. These aromatic
organics are a prime contributor
to the complexity one finds in older whites.
Another character of ageable whites is residual sugar...sweetness.
Anecdotally, by some
chemical processes not fully understood, residual sugar
acts as a preservative in these
whites and gives them an unexpected longevity.
What are some of these ageable whites?? Certainly some Grand
Cru Burgundies... French
Chablis is another genre. French Alsatian Gewurztraiminer,
Riesling, and Pinot Gris all
seem to do well at 10-20 year's of age. German Riesling-based
wines, from both great years
like 2001 and 2002, and even some lesser years, do quite
well. Austrian Rieslings and
Gruner Veltliners are another. Many Australian Rieslings
and Semillons, with their steely
acidity, can age forever. Some of the French Rhone whites,
based on the Roussanne and
Marsanne varieties, do quite well. The Rhone Viogniers from
Condrieu..they're a huge gamble
and often go nowhere fast.
The amazing fact is that many of these ageable whites don't
cost an arm and a leg.
You can buy some Australian Rieslings for $15-$25, put them
away in cool conditions, and
trot them out 15-20 years from now, and wow your wine friends
on your perscapacity in
selecting whites. They'll think you're a genius... at least
my friends do....(insert big
guffaw here!!).
So... how was that '61 Latour?? I had only a brief snapshot
of the wine upon its opening.
It was much better than I expected for 43 year's of age.
Terrific aromatics of cedar and
pencil shavings bursting from the glass, the hallmark of
great/mature Red Bordeaux.
On the palate, a bit dried out and astringent, but still
complex and whispering of the
greatness it once had.
It reminded me a lot of my old Aunt Tott... not a lot of
get up and go left in her..but
a certain aura of class and elegance and a bit of a sparkle
in her eye; you just
knew she must have been quite the chick in her day.
____________________________
Next month's topic: Does Size Really Matter?? : The Stemware
Dilemma
____________________________
As part of the Taos Winter Wine Festival, a Great Chefs
of Taos wine dinner is being
held at El Monte Sagrado, featuring a meal prepared by five
of Taos' top chefs, on
Sunday, January 23. The wines will be selected by Ken Collura,
their
sommelier and one of the Nation's best... a real pro who
New Mexico is very
fortunate to have as a local.
____________________________
Wine of the Month: Domaine Barmes Buecher Rosenberg de Wettolsheim
Gewurztraminer 2000:
Made from biodynamically-farmed grapes (a later column topic),
this wine has the intense/
powerful classic spicy smells of lychee and hair oil one
finds in Alsatian Gewurz, and
seldom elsewhere. Soft/rich/lush on the palate, maybe a
bit off-dry, slightly smoky; with
a finish that keeps on going with that same lychee/perfumed
character. I wouldn't be
at all surprised if this wine is still going strong at 10-15
year's of age. A North
Berkeley Imports selection and a steal at $17.00
_____________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
Size DOES Matter: The Stemware Dilemma
It's often stated that "size DOES matter". Some
would also add that shape matters, too.
This, especially, applies to wine stemware. In this month's
column, a hodgepodge of solid
facts, pseudo-science, and WAGs (a scientific term denoting
highly speculative claims); we'll
look at the options in choosing wine stemware and what's
"best".
When I first started teaching wine appreciation classes
some years ago, in keeping with
my own casual approach towards wine; I would state, only
half facetiously, that you could
taste wines perfectly well out of Skippy Peanut Butter jars.
Over the last few years, with an astonishing proliferation
of wine glasses
in all shapes, sizes, and costs; seeds of doubt were planted
in my mind about the above
assertion. As I would occasional sniff other taster's wines,
compared to my tried and true
INAO tasting glass that was my standard tasting stem; these
seeds took root.
This was particularly hammered home in a vertical tasting
(a range of different vintages)
several months ago I attended of the fabled Jaboulet LaChapelle
Hermitages, dating back 20
years. These wines have very distinctive noses of espresso/roasted/smoky/meaty
character.
I was getting very little from the wines; everyone else
was raving about them. Finally
I smelled my neighbor's glass, a huge burgundy balloon.
There it was, in all its glory; that
classic roasted Northern Rhone Syrah nose. My diminutive
INAO tasting glass was NOT up to the
task of tasting these great wines.
Thirty years ago, when I started tasting wines; one's choice
of stemware was pretty
limited. There was the basic Libby set, available for a
song. If you were really high end,
you used your finest Waterford cut-glass crystal; pretty
to look at, but not well suited
for fine wine.
Shapes were equally limited; just the basic Bordeaux and
Burgundy shapes, of several
differing sizes.
Starting some 15 years ago, the stemware of Riedel burst
upon the wine scene. This
is a family owned Bohemian glassware firm that traces its
lineage back to 1678.
This glassware explosion was primarily triggered by 8'th
generation Claus Riedel, who
started to promote a wide variety of differing shapes and
sizes, each "designed" for a
particular type of wine. His handsome and personable son,
Georg Riedel, began to travel the
world; holding demonstrative tastings to "prove"
to consumers the validity of their designs.
For the last few years, Georg has been a fixture at the
SantaFe Wine & Chile Fiesta with
his tastings, making more than a few converts. It's a seminar
I would highly recommend.
There is a mind-boggling wealth of information on the Riedel
web site (www.riedel.com).
It quotes multiple scientific studies to support their designs.
It takes a pretty strong
leap of faith, in some cases, to get from point A to point
B. As a scientist, I question
some of the Riedel claims.
For example, several of the Riedels have extravagantly flared
lips. The claim is that the
design of the lips is to deliver the wine to a certain part
of the tongue to emphasize
certain positive aspects of the wine for which the glass
was designed. I find this assertion
a bit specious.
But, that being said, there is NO arguing the bottom line...
the various Riedel glasses
DO make a difference; sometimes subtle, sometimes dramatic;
in the way one's senses perceive
a wine.
When developing a new glass design for a particular wine,
they DO do their research. They
will fabricate a set of certain shapes that they intuit
will work well for that particular
wine. They then do extensive tasting trials, using experts
in that particular wine, to come
to a consensus on the "ideal" shape for that wine.
Whether that shape would match MY
preference for that wine is a whole 'nother question.
There is a bewildering choice of shapes and sizes, all tailored
to compliment each type
of wine. And there is a considerable range in pricing as
well; from less expensive (note I
did not state inexpensive!) machine-formed glasses, to the
very expensive hand-blown and very
delicate Sommelier models; and everything in between.
Over the last few months, I've been taking a closer look
at the wine glasses I use for
tastings. This look was prompted when I was gifted by a
friend of the Sommelier set that
Georg used in this Fall's Riedel seminar. These hand-blown
stems retail for $60... apiece!!
I would much rather spend that kind of money on wine rather
than stemware.
The threesome; the Montrachet, Grand Cru Burgundy, and Grand
Cru Bordeaux; are truly
beautiful works of art...and very fragile. It gives me the
heebie-jeebies to use them.
I'm convinced they'll shatter into a bazillion pieces if
I just look crosswise at them.
When you swirl the wine, you can actually feel the stem
flexing in your fingertips.
Beads of cold sweat break out upon my forehead when I wash
them. I'm literally
frightened by those suckers.
Nonetheless, I took a deep breath and put them to the test
on several dozen different
wines; mostly reds, but some whites. The results of this
less-than-scientific study?? Mixed!!
In nearly all cases, there were noticeable differences in
the noses of the wines...
sometimes quite dramatic, sometimes very subtle. On the
palate, I found the differences in
the glasses not nearly as striking.
In some cases, the wine for which one of the glasses was
optimally designed came through.
In other cases, such was not so. In only one case, did my
beloved, diminutive INAO tasting
glass shine.
The only conclusion I reached was that, on average, the
Burgundy-balloon shaped Montrachet
glass, the smallest of the threesome (though certainly not
small) frequently performed best.
In no case did the large Red Bordeaux glass prove best,
even with a Red Bordeaux wine.
So.... what's the bottom line?? Well.....like many questions
in the realm of wine...there
seems to be no solid, definitive answer; it all depends....
on the wine, the circumstances,
and, most importantly, one's own palate.
And that seems to be the consensus opinion of many of my
wine friends. They mostly have
a certain stem that they prefer to use, in general. Tasting
Santa Rita Hills Pinots??? Maybe
the Red Burgundy will perform best, maybe the California
Pinot glass... it's a bit of a
crap shoot.
In my own case; I'm not running out to buy a dozen Sommelier
Montrachet glasses... certainly
not at $60 a pop. I HAVE pretty much abandoned use of my
INAO tasting glass, even though it
WAS designed by a group of French tasting experts as ideal
for tasting wines.
For dinner parties, where a five ounce pour is much more
reasonable than a one ounce tasting
pour; I've gone to larger glasses to emphasize the aromatics.
And for my beloved Skippy Peanut Butter jars??? Off to recycle
for them...never to grace my
table again!!
_____________________________
The Taos Winter Wine Festival kicked off Wednesday with
a pair of seminars. Grand tastings
are scheduled for both Fridays. Information and reservations
can be found at www.SkiTaos.org.
_____________________________
I have a particular passion for Rhone-style wines from around
the world. Every year I
usually go to two events in California that feature these
wines. The Rhone Ranger's tasting
(www.RhoneRangers.org) is on March 19 in San Francisco.
The three day Hospices du Rhone
Festival (www.hospicedurhone.com) will be May 12-14 in Paso
Robles, CA. Both events are highly
recommended for serious Rhoners.
_____________________________
Wine of the Month: Covey Run Washington State Syrah 2002:
Very dark/opaque color; classic
licorice/blackberry Washington State/terroir-driven Syrah
nose with a touch of oak; soft
bit lean licorice/blackberry slight peppery/earthy flavor;
short licorice/blackberry/
peppery finish with light tannins. It's rare to find a distinctive
Washington Syrah with
this much varietal character and terroir at an $8 price.
_____________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
Biodynamic Wines: The New Religion??
Over the last thirty years, the steady growth of organic
farming in this country has
been inescapably obvious; when even the large grocery chains
have embraced organic
products with a fervor that belies their focus on the bottom
line. America's love for
farmer's markets, the Slow Food movement, heritage turkey
and pig varieties, and such;
all suggest that we are becoming more aware of where our
produce originates and how
it is grown and tastes.
In this article, we will examine this topic as it applies
to grape growing, winemaking,
and, perhaps, the next big thing: application of biodynamic
techniques to wine.
Organic Grapes and Wines
It is important to make the distinction between wines made
from (certified)
organically-grown grapes and organically-made wines. The
difference is huge.
There are a fair number of organically-grown wines; led
by the Bonterra portfolio from
Mendocino County, a specialty line of the huge Brown-Forman
and Fetzer operation.
Lolonis Vineyards, also in Mendocino, touts their use of
ladybugs for pest control as
an important feature of their organically-grown grapes.
The list of organically-MADE wines is, however, rather limited.
Easily the most well-
known and widely distributed are those of Frey Vineyards.
Sonoma's Coturri Winery wines
are much more difficult find.
The unique feature of organically-made wine is that they
have no added sulfites, although
tiny amounts of sulfites (several ppb) are naturally occurring
in any wine, a byproduct
of the fermentation process. Most winemakers are judicious
in their use of sulfites, but
very few would totally eschew its use.
In fact, there are a number of highly-regarded winemakers
who buy some of their grapes
or make wines from organically-farmed vineyards. The Araujo
Napa Valley Cabernet from
the famed Eisele vineyard is, without doubt, one of California's
greatest Cabernets; a
world-class wine.
However, most of these producers see little compelling reason
to trumpet their use
of organically-grown grapes. Moreover, many view the "organic"
on a label as the kiss
of death; a marketing stigmata that would hinder, not help,
sales.
So what about these organic wines?? In many fine wine shops,
there is a small section
devoted to organic wines. The wines generally sit forlornly
off to one side, older vintages
covered with dust. And, quite frankly, deservedly so.
I've had some good and decent organically-grown wines over
the years. But nothing has
been profound. No wine, thus far, has made a compelling
case for the
superiority of organically-grown grapes over non-organic
when it comes to making a wine.
As for organically-made wine.... I'm out the door and up
the street. Some of the most
wretched wines I've ever tasted have been organically-made;
wines teeming with biological
activity because of their lack of added sulfur. Biological
activity in cheese is good
(think Epoisses); in wine, it is asking for trouble.
Biodynamic Farming
Over the last few years, biodynamic farming of grape vines,
a practice that is the next
step beyond organic farming, has become a buzzword that
is heard with increasing frequency.
From my experience with organic wines, I was prepared to
dismiss biodynamics out of hand.
Publication of two new books (Biodynamic Wines by Monty
Waldin and Wine: From Sky to
Earth by Nicolas Joly) recently has piqued my interest on
the subject. The first is a rather
objective, dispassionate description of biodynamic grape
growing by a British wine author who
has worked with the Fetzers in Mendocino, strong adherents
of biodynamics. The latter is by
probably the greatest producer of Savennieres in the Loire
Valley, Coulee de Serrant, who's
one of the world's most passionate advocates of biodynamic
grape growing.
Having read these two books... what is now my view of biodynamics??
Alas... even more
confused than ever!! As I read through these tomes, the
scientist in me snorts in consternation
at some of the WooWoo/VooDoo procedures puts forth as dogma.
And...yet... the scientist
in me also cautions to keep an open mind on the subject;
maybe there is more to biodynamics
than meets the eye. The jury is still out.
Biodynamics dates back to the teachings and preachings (note
I did NOT say science) of the
German Rudolf Steiner, circa 1920. Much of the impetus for
its usage in California has
come from Michael Maltus and Alan York, planners for many
of Mendocino's biodynamic grape
vineyards, including the Fetzer's McNab Ranch.
Many of the practices embraced by biodynamic farming are
no different than sensible techniques
practiced by organic farmers; the rejection of chemical,
inorganic fertilizers, pesticides,
and herbicides; practices that are known to be harmful to
the soil and the grapevines, and,
ultimately, humans.
But, then, some things get to be a little out of hand and
a bit suspect to me as a scientist.
I can easily accept the concept of the moon affecting living
plants. The gravitational
force of the moon produces tides. Does the moon's gravity
cause the sap to rise in the
grapevine?? I don't know...perhaps??
But when it comes to the importance of alignment of the
planets and the stars in the
application of fertilization solutions... that I have a
bit more trouble in accepting.
The value of compost heaps for fertilizing grapevines in
lieu of ammonium nitrate??
No problem to me. But the necessity of poking holes in the
compost heap with a broomstick
(a plastic tube is verboten...won't work), at prescribed
angles, to insert mixtures of "stuff"
from inside the horn of a cow, that has been buried in the
vineyard for months (and whose
orientation...point up towards the stars or point down towards
the earth.. is crucial), during
a prescribed phase of the lunar cycle??? That causes me
to shake my head in puzzlement.
Yet...YET....the proponents of biodynamic grape growing;
people like Jim and John Fetzer,
Michel Chapoutier, Craig Williams (of Joseph Phelps)...
these are really bright people who
cannot be dismissed with the wave of the hand as nut cases
on the lunatic fringe . There's
got to be more to biodynamics than meets the eyes.
On the other hand, the near-religious zeal with which some
biodynamicists espouse their views,
including Nicolas Joly, makes my BS antenna quiver.
Where The Future Lies
There is no doubt that smart grape growers everywhere are
moving in the direction of more
organic farming practices; minimizing or halting their use
of harmful chemicals on their land.
It may, perhaps, be more expensive in the short term; but
the benefits in the long term
seem clear.
However, the commitment to go the biodynamic route, with
all its preparations and cow's
horns and stag's bladders stuffed with valerian and what
not, is not so clear cut. Much of
biodynamics is based on folklore and anecdotal evidence,
with very little science to back it up.
And we know darned well that Monsanto is not going to be
funding any studies into the efficacy
of biodynamics.
My guess is, as more and more growers approach biodynamics
with an open mind and
implement some of its practices, that the essence of biodynamics
will be embraced, and much
of the WooWoo/VooDoo will fall by the wayside.
Will organic or biodynamic grapes ever produce superior
wines to those made now?? THAT
remains the $64 question. The payoff may NOT, necessarily,
be in greater wines. It may be in
the intangibles; healthier vineyards, better soils, less
chemicals in our environment, and
less harmful impact on our planet in producing our wines.
Now how bad could that be??
______________________
Ken Collura, sommelier at De la Tierra restaurant at El
Monte Sagrado resort in Taos, will
be leading two wine seminars. This Thursday (2/24/05) will
be focused on the Zinfandel
grape variety. Next Thursday (3/3/05) will feature Rhone
Varietals from California. Ken
is probably the most knowledgeable wine person in all New
Mexico. I've found his seminars
to be extremely educational, not to mention entertaining.
A Sideways Glance At Santa Barbara County
Some have read the book, most have seen the movie. Now it's
time to drink the wines.
In today's column, I'll take more than a Sideways glance
at the wines coming from Santa
Barbara County.
I have followed the wines of Santa Barbara from the very
start, which goes back to
the late 1970's when many new plantings of vineyards were
taking place the length of
California's Central Coast. Although those early wines,
like Chardonnays from Zaca Mesa
and Tepesquet Vineyards, were hardly remarkably; they DID
have a certain perfume and
minerality to them that suggested, once the farming was
improved, the wines may become
something truly special.
Geography
Santa Barbara, the town, is located in the Southern part
of the County; much too cold
and ocean-influenced to grow grapes. The vineyards are all
located in the Northern part
of the County. In fact, there has been much political tension
between the liberal town
and the much more conservative agricultural area. There
is a movement afoot
for the agrarian North to form their own county.
The two primary growing areas are the Santa Maria Valley
and the Santa Ynez Valley. The
former, is located just east of the bucolic town of Santa
Maria; a town now more noted for
trials than the expansive strawberry farms on its outskirts.
The vineyards are located
primarily on alluvial flood plains along the Santa Maria
river and bench lands sloping upwards
towards the San Rafael mountains. This is where much of
the early Santa Barbara plantings
occurred.
About 30 miles south, running in an east/west direction
between the towns of Los Olivos
to Lompoc, lies the Santa Ynez Valley, centered about the
town of Buellton on Highway 101.
The kitschy Danish town of Solvang is the big tourist draw,
pre-Sideways, of the area.
To the west of Buellton lies a new sub-appellation called
the Santa Rita Hills. After
a brief squabble with Chile's huge Santa Rita winery, the
region has won the right to use
the name of the hills that border this end of the Santa
Ynez Valley. In the last few years,
this area has become one of the hottest (in the popularity
sense) new growing regions in
California.
Starting north of Los Olivos is Foxen Canyon Road. This
narrow valley connects the inland
side of the Santa Ynez Valley and the Santa Maria Valley.
Many wineries and smaller vineyards
are located along this road.
Paralleling it about 10 miles to the west is Highway 101.
Most of the vineyards here are
located in the rolling hills about the tiny town of Los
Alamos, the older but less famous
one.
Finally, along several roads connecting the 101 and Foxen
Canyon, are a number of vineyards
tucked up into the hills and canyons of the ridge that bisects
the two north/south
thoroughfares.
Climate
The climate in Santa Barbara County varies from cool to
very cool, primarily
influenced by the nearby Pacific Ocean. The Santa Maria
Valley tends to be a bit cooler than
most of the Santa Ynez Valley. Much like the Napa Valley,
the Santa Ynez Valley has a
considerable range in temperatures, with the western Santa
Rita Hills the coldest of all in
the County. A gradation of 15 degrees, east to west, is
not uncommon.
Grapes
The early plantings in Santa Barbara, during the late 1970's,
were understandably driven
by the varieties then in vogue: Chardonnay, Cabernet, and
some Sauvignon Blanc... Myles
beloved Pinot Noir?? ... hardly any existed.
The growers soon figured out that the climate was not amenable
to good Cabernet... the
wines tended towards the herbal/vegetal/weedy part of the
spectrum. This also, to a lesser
extent, bedevils the Sauvignon Blanc.
Some of the first Pinot Noir came from the large Bien Nacido
vineyard up in the Santa
Maria Valley. Early producers, like Jim Clendenen (Au Bon
Climate), Adam Tolmach
(Ojai Vineyards), Ric Sanford (Sanford and Benedict), and
Ken Brown (Byron Vineyards) made
strong cases for the future success of the Pinot grape.
Now, the Santa Rita Hills has become
the hotbed for Pinot in the County.
Primarily driven by Qupe's Bob Lindquist, the Rhone varietals,
like Viognier and Syrah,
experienced a torpid growth through the 1980's. Since the
late 1990's, though, their growth
has been explosive. Now the County is recoqnized for producing
some of the greatest Syrah in
California.
Small pockets of other varieties exist. Germany's Dornfelder??...
yup...Norm Huber has
some planted in the Santa Rita Hills. California's native
(more or less) grape, Zinfandel,
hasn't really seemed to catch on, although some terrific
examples can be found, like from
the Lafond vineyard.
Some Italian varietals, like Nebbiolo, Barbera, and Sangiovese,
can be found here and there.
At the hands of Palmina's Steve Clifton; these are starting
to show real potential.
There is even an ancient pre-1900 planting of the venerable
Mission grape. Deborah Hall
(Gypsy Canyon Winery) uses the tiny production for her Angelica
dessert wine.
The Movie
So.... what did I think of the movie Sideways?? I thought
it was an entertaining piece of fluff,
but just that. I enjoyed seeing some friends in the background
of several scenes. I was jazzed
by seeing a number of scenes with which I'm very familiar,
like the Hitching Post restaurant.
It gave me a lot of good chuckles. The wine-related parts
were particularly well-done and
true-to-life.
What I did not like were many of the reviews of the movie
and their attempts to draw
profundities about the flick and the tedious psychoanalysis
of the characters ("Was Myles
an alcoholic?"...probably not. "Was Jack a cad
and a jerk?".. absolutely!!)
But it is, I think, good entertainment...nothing more. If
you've not seen it yet, it's
worth renting when it's released on DVD.... and enjoying
it with a glass of Santa Barbara
Pinot Noir in hand.
_____________________________
Wine of the Month: Jaffurs Santa Barbara Syrah 2002: A great
example of how Santa Barbara
excels with Rhone varietals. Very dark in color. A nose
redolent of blackberries with a spicy/
peppery undertone. A touch of toasty oak gives it a bit
of Northern Rhone character. The
palate reveals loads of Syrah/blackberry fruit and a roasted/oak
character. The tannins in the
long finish suggest it will go for another 3-6 years of
age. A real value at about $22 a
bottle.
_____________________________
Ken Collura, wine director at El Monte Sagrado resort in
Taos, continues to offer his
excellent wine seminars (schedule at www.ElMonteSagrado.com).
On Friday (April 22) he will
lead a seminar on Bordeaux wines with a representative from
Stacole Imports. The following
night will be a special dinner pairing other Bordeauxs with
Chef Kevin Graham's cuisine.
_____________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
Bugs and Vines: A Never-Ending Battle
In today's column, we'll take a look at some of the warfare
going on in the vineyards
that farmers, then and now, must wage to provide us grapes
for our wines.
The inspiration came from a new book, The Botanist and the
Vintner, by Christy Campbell,
that describes the phylloxera epidemic that devastated vineyards
throughout the world
in the late 1800's. The story of a root louse usually makes
for pretty boring reading.
However, as Campbell weaves his tale, it becomes an absolutely
riveting read.
Back in the late 1700's and most of the 1800's, grape growing
was much simpler
and the vineyards looked vastly different than they do today;
where the rows of vines are
marching up hill and down dale in orderly lines. The vines
(species Vitis Vinifera) in
Europe had evolved naturally and had few natural predators
in that environment. The
vineyards were worked entirely by hand and horse; the vines
planted hither and yon,
helter-skelter, in what is known as "viticultura promiscua".
When a vine died, the long
branch of the adjacent vine was buried, where it took root,
the shoot severed from the
original vine, and...voila...the new vine was born. It was
a simple, neat, tidy little
world in the vineyard. A world that would not last.
Vines are propagated by cuttings, not from seeds. Certain
varieties are acknowledged to
produce superior wines. Consequently, the vineyards across
Europe
are populated by vast clones of genetically uniform plant
material; a lack of biogenetic
diversity. And, as it was with the potato blight in the
1840's, these vineyards are sitting
ducks for the first mutant bug that Darwinian theory tells
us will eventually appear.
Such a catastrophe struck in the 1830's in the eastern vineyards
of America. A grayish
fungal mold began to attack the underside of grape leaves,
causing them to wither and
stopping the photosynthesis process. The vines would eventually
die. Since there was a
continual flow of American native vines across the Atlantic
to Europe, it eventually appeared
in England and then spread to France. This mold, called
powdery mildew or oidium, devastated
the European vineyards by the early 1850's. Botanists and
viticulturists eventually figured
out, through much research, that sulfur was the magic bullet.
Eventually, spraying the vines
in well-timed attacks with a copper sulfate solution (Bordeaux
mixture) was introduced and
the oidium was brought under control by the late 1850's.
When the colonists first came to America, native grape vines
were abundant (species Vitis
Labrusca mostly). Alas, the wines they made were much inferior
to the European wines they
enjoyed. The aristocracy, like Thomas Jefferson, whose appreciation
of fine Ho-Brion wine was
legendary, imported cuttings of European vines to plant.
They would grow well for a few years,
and then mysteriously wither and die.
Native American vines, vigorous growers, were imported into
England and France, mostly for
ornamental purposes. The French soon found that though the
vines thrived, the wines from them
were dreadful. But the seeds of the next devastation to
befall the European vineyards, now
fully recovered and enjoying their heyday, were planted
by 1860.
In Spring of 1862, a Monsieur Borty, a wine merchant in
the town of Roquemaure in France's
Gard region, received a box of American cuttings from a
New York friend, which he proceeded to
plant in his tiny vineyard. The vines were happy in their
new home and prospered. Little did
M. Borty know the millions of dollars loss to the French
economy that would eventually ensue
from his innocent act over the next 30 years.
The very next year, a few kilometers to the south, vines
in one vineyard began to shrivel
and die by August from a mysterious malady with no obvious
cause. The following year, 1864,
M. Borty's own Alicante and Grenache vines succumbed to
the same calumny, and died. The
flames flickered that would eventually engulf all the vineyards
of Europe and California.
As the disease spread through the Southern Rhone, its cause
was still unknown. Dead vines
were uprooted by the scientists, but nothing was found.
In the Spring of 1868, botanist
J.E. Planchon inadvertently dug up a healthy vine adjacent
to a diseased one and found the
roots teeming with tiny aphids. They were eventually named
Phylloxera Vastatrix (dry-leaf
devastator), a tiny aphid that had been identified in America
in 1856. The cause of the malady
had been found. However, how to combat the infestation was
not forthcoming for more than ten
years and, even then, the solution was slow to be accepted.
The Phylloxera, whose sex and life cycle in America is considerably
different than in
Europe, pokes its proboscis into the roots of a healthy
vine and inserts, as it feeds,
slobber that cankers the roots and halts the flow of nutrients
up the vine. It than crawls on
to the next healthy vine and repeats its lousy destruction.
Fast forward to 1879. By now, it has been found that the
Vinifera vines can be grafted onto
rootstock of native American vines (species Vitis Riparia,
Labrusca, and others), which,
having evolved in the presence of the louse, had developed
a resistance to the Phylloxera's
bite. Thank you, Dr. Darwin.
Even knowing the solution to conquering the root louse,
acceptance of it throughout Europe
was not a given. The chauvinistic French were convinced
that these American roots would have
a bad influence on the taste of their wines. That debate
raged for many years, with many
comparative tastings unable to settle the issue. Even as
late as 1890, when phylloxera finally
reached its last outpost in France, the Champagne, the issue
was unsettled.
Even, to this day, the issue, though moot, is debated. There
are some old-fogey British
connoisseurs that still grouse that the modern Bordeaux
just isn't as good as their beloved
pre-phylloxera Claret. They may well be right, but for reasons
other than native American
rootstocks; and the evidence is dwindling down to nothing.
All the French politics during the Phylloxera epidemic,
many of the bizarre means of
combating the root louse, the science of the investigations,
the role of famous Americans like
Thomas V. Munson, are all detailed in Campbell's fascinating
book. It's a read that many,
wine lover or not, will find engrossing.
_____________________________
Next month: Modern Pests in California and GMO Grapevines
_____________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
Vineyard Warfare in California
In last month's column, we looked at the phylloxera root
louse that devastated the
European vineyards in the late 1800's. In today's column,
we look at some of the pests
that have wreaked havoc in the California vineyards.
As the phylloxera was spreading throughout Europe in the
1860's, the source of the
malady as yet then unknown; it, not surprisingly, reared
it's ugly head in California
in the late 1860's. The phylloxera was a native to this
country and the American species,
as they evolved over the eons, developed an immunity to
its lousy bite.
All the vines planted in California were of the species
Vitis Vinifera, mostly the
Mission variety brought by the Spanish padres through Mexico,
and the more popular
European varieties like Cabernet and Carignane, allegedly
brought by Agoston Haraszthy,
primarily, from that continent.
Vinifera, easy prey to the phylloxera, were not attacked
because the louse was not
found in the Golden State, only the Eastern and Southern
US. The Western mountains acted
as an effective barrier to its migration towards the Pacific.
However, with all the passing back and forth across the
Atlantic of grapevine cuttings,
it seemed inevitable that phylloxera would show up in California.
And indeed it did,
surfacing first in Sonoma. It eventually spread to most
of California's
grape growing regions, then primarily Sonoma, Napa, the
Santa Clara Valley, Contra Costa,
and the San Joaquin Valley.
But the spread was slow, the solution of grafting to native
American rootstocks known
by then and eagerly embraced. So phylloxera didn't have
the ruinous impact in California
that it did in Europe.
Fast forward to the 1930's, post-Prohibition, and the establishment
of the Davis School
of Viticulture and Enology. Much scientific research was
being conducted to get the
California wine industry back on its feet. The focus was
economic, how to best maximize
production. One of the studies concluded that Vinifera grafted
to a rootstock known as
AxR (Aramon crossed with Vitis Rupestris) was the most productive
match.
With the huge expansion of vineyard plantings in California
in the '60's-'70's, most
of the vines, with Davis' blessing, went into the ground
on AxR. Although this was
undoubtedly known to the Davis researchers, the French had
found back in the 1870's
that AxR rootstock was only weakly resistant to phylloxera
and recommended against it
usage in French vineyards. A disaster waiting to happen.
And happen it did. Once again, Darwin did its nasty work.
In the late 1980's, an
outbreak of phylloxera was identified in the heart of the
Napa Valley, munching its way
through AxR-rooted vineyards common to new plantings. The
researchers sprung into action
and soon found a new mutant of commonly-found phylloxera,
labeled Biotype B, that thrived
on attacking the AxR rootstock.
The solution was simple. Plant to something other than AxR
rootstock. And this they did
throughout California in the 1990's. The replanting costs
soared into the millions of dollars,
but the devastation to the California vineyards was minimized.
And some good came out of
the Biotype B infestation. Much thought was put into the
replantings, especially to vine
spacing and choice of appropriate varieties.
Pierce's Disease
Currently, the vineyards throughout California are once
again under attack. Pierce's
disease (PD), as it is known, unfortunately has no known
solution and little prospect
is on the horizon.
This disease was first discovered in the vineyards of Anaheim
in the 1880's,
hastening (along with urban expansion) the demise of grape
growing in Orange County. It
slowly spread up the coast into Northern California vineyards,
where it exists to this day.
PD is caused by a bacterium known as Xylella fastidiosa.
It infects the xylem of the
grapevine and halts the flow of water from the roots, eventually
killing the vine through
lack of water. It is spread, primarily, by a sap-sucking
insect known as the blue-green
sharpshooter.
Control of PD can only be accomplished, at this time, by
control of this
sharpshooter, which is primarily found in heavy forests,
underbrush, and moist riparian
habitats in the vicinity of the vineyards. Until recently,
PD was thus controlled by
destroying this sharpshooter and its nearby habitats, reducing
the infestation to the
"nuisance" level.
However, in the early 1990's, another vector for PD was
identified, the glassy-
wing sharpshooter. Originating in citrus and avocado groves,
this sharpshooter laid waste
to the vineyards in the Temecula area, which have since
been mostly replanted.
Because it travels much longer distances than the blue-green,
the glassy-wing sharpshooter
represents a much bigger threat to California vineyards.
It has since spread into the southern
part of the Central Valley and as far north as Ventura County.
Egg deposits have been found
on ornamental plants brought in from Southern California
to Napa and Sonoma counties, but
the insect itself has not been found there. Some glassy-wings
have been found in small
outbreaks in other North Coast counties, but appear to have
been contained by an aggressive
spraying program.
However, it seem likely that the quarantine programs will
fail and the glassy-wing will
eventually spread throughout Northern California. The economic
impact could potentially be
devastating and dwarf that of phylloxera's infestation.
Although many dollars are being poured into a search for
a cure, an acceptable solution
seems far off. One successful approach is to inject tiny
amounts of antibacterial
agents like Streptomycin, into the vine. But having such
agents in one's wines, even at
minute levels, will not be politically acceptable.
Another potential solution is splicing genes from PD-resistant
plants like citrus trees
into the grapevine gene system. However, such GMO (genetically
modified organisms) vines
raise the specter of "frankenvines" taking over
the world in some sectors of the population
and, thus, seems politically untenable.
So, for now, controlling the glassy-wing populations through
insecticides and minimizing
its nearby habitats, is the only viable solution; one loaded
with political ramifications.
_____________________________
Wine recommendation of the Month: Garretson Wine Company
in Paso Robles has just introduced
two Enchantment Cuvee Rhone-blend wines into New Mexico.
The white is a Viognier/Roussanne
blend. The red is 70% Syrah, plus Mourvedre, Grenache, and
Viognier. Finished in a screwcap
bottle and priced just below $20, they are good values and
typify some of the exceptional
Rhone-style wines emerging from the Central Coast.
_____________________________
On June 18, the SantaFe Convivium of Slow Food will hold
a special showing of the
controversial wine film Mondovino. Afterwards, a panel,
moderated by Greg O'Byrne, will
discuss their views on the movie, accompanied by appropriate
wines intended to demonstrate
some of the contentious points of the film.
_____________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
Mondovino, Wine Critics, and the Curse of Points
The Jonathan Nossiter film Mondovino finally opened in Santa
Fe a few weeks ago in
a fundraising debut for the local Slow Food convivium. This
month's column will segue
from a critique of the movie into the subject of wine critics
and their abominable
point scores.
Mondovino is definitely a wine geek's movie. The more general
populace is likely to
find it tedious and incredibly boring. Worse, the movie
and its cinematography is extremely
amateurish. I've seen more professional productions from
the Los Alamos High School Film 101
class.
Nossiter clears has a not-so-subtle agenda to his film;
that the globalization of wine
styles, driven by large corporations, is evil and that only
small, poor, artisan winemakers
are worth drinking. Such a premise is, I feel, laughable
and hardly worth a 2+ hour movie.
Making a movie with an agenda is hardly objectionable, even
if you don't agree with that
agenda. Michael Moore has done it most successfully. Nossiter
has not.
Probably the biggest objection I have to his flick is the
blatant weaving of politics
throughout to make his point. By clever questioning and
camera shots, the wealthy, corporate,
evil, large winemakers are seen to be Regan-loving, Nazi-collaborating,
Mussolini-worshiping
behemoths. The poor, small artisan wine growers in France
and Italy survive only because
of Communist support; a generalization that's patently ludicrous.
The movie makes much of the Mondavi family's expansion throughout
the global wine market
and, successfully and accurately, depicts them as all about
image and marketing. In point of
fact, the Mondavi operation is small potatoes on the global
scale and the Mondavis themselves
have not made an original contribution to the wine making
industry since the late-'60's.
The avuncular peasant Aime Guibert of Mas Du Daumas Gasac
in the Languedoc of France is
sympathetically portrayed as one of the last holdout traditionalists
in the wine world.
More nonsense. His winery (which is never shown) is as modern
and up-to-date as any in the
world. Guibert eschewed use of the traditional Languedoc
varieties like Cinsault and Carignan
and, instead, planted heavily the ubiquitous, international
varieties of Chardonnay and
Cabernet Sauvignon. Traditionalist?? Hardly!!
One of the amusing facets of the movie was Nossiter's frequent
filming of the dogs of his
various interviewees, and they were plentiful. But, again,
to further his agenda. The bad-guys
all had viscious, ugly pit-bull kinds of dogs. The humble
peasant winegrowers all had loveable,
face-licking canines. The dogs of some of the good/bad guys
were not portrayed, probably
because they didn't fit the agenda.
Which brings us to George and the wine critics. George is
the famed Robert Parker's late
bulldog; as ugly a mutt as you'd ever see. The scenes interviewing
Parker focused much on
George's flatulance problem. Whether this was to further
Nossiter's agenda as Parker leading
the charge for wine globalization and homogenizing of wine
tastes or not is unclear to me.
The several close-up shots of George's nether regions was
rather uncalled for I thought.
That Parker, publisher of The Wine Advocate, is the world's
most influential wine critic
is unarguable. The movie attempts to portray him as the
prime shaper of a wine style that
is homogenizing wines world-wide, primarily by emphasizing
his friendship with globe-
trotting winemaker Michel Rolland. That portrayal is weak,
I feel.
As a wine critic, Parker is a man I unabashedly admire.
He writes with a passion for his
subject that is rare in the wine world; a passion that is
sometimes overdone. He has an
incredible palate and his work ethic is as strong as is
found in any profession.
_____________________________
Wine recommendation of the Month: Garretson Wine Company
in Paso Robles has just introduced
two Enchantment Cuvee Rhone-blend wines to New Mexico. The
white is a Viognier/Roussanne
blend. The red is 70% Syrah, plus Mourvedre, Grenache, and
Viognier. Finished in a screwcap
bottle and priced just below $20, they are good values and
typify some of the exceptional
Rhone-style wines emerging from the Central Coast.
_____________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
California Burgundy and Chablis Are OK
Wine labeling in the USofA falls under three different categories:
generic,
proprietary, and varietal. Varietal labels identify the
wine by the grape variety (or varieties)
from which it is primarily (> 75%) made.
Proprietary labels identify the wine by some made-up (usually)
name that the winery hopes
will convey something positive to the consumer. Joseph Phelps
Insignia, a Cabernet blend, is one
such example.
Finally, generic labeling identifies the wine after a certain
wine style (like Port or Sherry)
or from some geographic region in Europe (like Burgundy
or Chablis). Today's column will focus
on this third category.
It seems as if, with tiresome regularity, there is a great
hue and cry to prohibit use of generic
labeling in this country. These diatribes are usually put
forth under the guise of protecting
the consumer from misleading, confusing, and outright fraudulent
labeling practices. Baloney!!
Back in the pre-prohibition days, nearly all US wines were
generically labeled. It was only
post-prohibition that varietal labels became the norm in
this country. Interestingly, because of the
success of US varietals on the world market, the Europeans
are now moving more and more towards
varietal labeling, with the geographic identity being secondary.
The latest salvo in this battle was fired by a curious group
of wine industry bedfellows
who gathered in Napa last month to sign a declaration decrying
generic labeling, to save us dumb
consumers from being defrauded by the likes of Ernest &
Julio Gallo and Fred Franzia. They were
arguing for the sanctity of wine place names like Burgundy
and Champagne.
Just how deceptive is generic labeling?? In all cases, the
geographic origin MUST be identified
on the label. It is ALWAYS labeled as California Champagne
or California Chablis. In no way could
the consumer be misled into believing those are French wines.
Furthermore, the people buying these generic wines are a
totally separate segment of the
market. Someone drinking a $5 jug of Almaden Chablis is
highly unlikely to suddenly spring for
a $60 bottle of the real Chablis. Were they given an opportunity
to try a pungent/flinty/stony
Chablis Grand Cru, I can guarantee they would not like it
at all compared to their standard fare.
Periodically, the French Appellation Control (INAO) people
will file a court case in the US to
ban the use of French place names on generic labels. And
just as frequently, the US judges quash
the case. The rulings in international courts are always
in the French favor; but they are simply
ignored by the US government authorities who regulate wine
labeling.
The case of Champagne is particularly interesting. In the
US, most of the populace identify
"champagne" as a white sparkling wine; NOT as
a wine from the French Champagne region, made by the
"methode champenois". In fact, many of the US
champagnes are every bit as good as their French
counterparts, at a fraction of the price. Interestingly,
the very fine New Mexico sparkler produced
by Gruet is labeled simply "sparkling wine", in
deference to their French family background.
And it gets more curiouser. There is a small town in Switzerland
named Champagne, which has been
producing dry/still table wines for centuries. The Champagne
authorities have recently won a ruling
from the EU to prohibit these small Swiss peasants from
using their own village name on their wine;
a wine that would never be confused with French Champagne.
Sanctity of geographic place name??
Hardly... it's just that the French Champagne producers
got to the EU bureaucrat's ticket booth first.
To me, their claims of geographic sanctity reek of hypocrisy.
The case of Portugal producers is another case. In nearly
everyone's mind, Port identifies a sweet/
fortified red dessert wine; not necessarily from the Duoro
Valley. The Portuguese finessed the issue
by labeling their wine as Oporto, a term that is forbidden
on US generic labels. Yet they still argue
that Port should be a protected name, applying only to their
wines.
And then what should a California-equivalent wine be termed
to identify it?? They have no suggestion
and could care less. One of California's finest Port producers,
Andrew Quady, sidestepped the issue by
labeling (and trademarking) his version of Port as Starboard!!
And still the Portuguese were not happy,
claiming that consumers might be deceived.
Another indicator of the hypocrisy surrounding the recently-issued
document is that one of the
signatories was Joel Aiken of Beaulieu Vineyards. It was
not so long ago that BV produced a
wine they labeled as "Special Burgundy". And a
mighty fine California wine it was...bearing absolutely
no resemblance to French Red Burgundy. In fact, it was far
superior to many French counterparts selling
at ten times the price.
My observation is that much of this ceaseless prattle against
generic labeling comes not from the
European authorities, but by high-end wine connoisseurs
in this country. They seem to have a special
need for other wine consumers to like the same wines they
do, to validate their tastes I suppose.
They seem to feel threatened that somebody might actually
be enjoying cheap Franzia Burgundy; for
they have seen the light and know that great Red Burgundy
is far superior.
So....bottom line... my recommendation is that if you like
Gallo Hearty Burgundy (I don't), you should
be free to go out and buy that wine. But you also owe it
to yourself to spring, at least once, for the
high-end French version at ten times the price. It's unlikely
you will like it; but at least you'll
know what the real McCoy is like. As it always should be,
my advice is to drink what YOU like. It's as
simple as that.
Santa Fe Wine & Chile Fiesta 2005
For the last 15 years, I've always looked forward to late
September in Santa Fe. In addition
to falling temperatures and vivid Autumn colors, it also
signals the arrival of the Santa Fe
Wine & Chile Fiesta, New Mexico's premier wine event.
Inaugurated fifteen years ago by Gordon
Heiss and Mark Miller, it was a small collection of tasting
booths tucked in the back parking
lot of San Busco (pre-Borders days); mostly distributors
pouring wines with which I was
already familiar.
Little, then, did I imagine it would morph into the present
mega-Fiesta, attracting people
from throughout the world for five intense days of seminars,
winemaker dinners, auctions, cooking
demonstrations, and a golf tournament. Its popularity has
grown to the point that some events
at SFW&CF are sold out within weeks of their registration
opening.
The linchpin of SFW&CF is, of course, Saturday's Grand
Tasting; an event that sold out over
a month ago. But do not despair, there is a waiting list
and tickets for this grand event have
a way of materializing at the last minute. After all, we're
not talking Super Bowl here!!
The Grand event CAN be a bit overwhelming for people not
used to such venues. With the often
crowded conditions at some booths, the smell of food and
smoke wafting through the air; it is
not the greatest milieu for serious contemplation of a wine.
Consequently, I use it primarily
to reconnoiter for wines that I wish to try at a later date
in a more controlled tasting
environment.
One of the frustrating aspects of the Grand tasting is the
inability to obtain a sample at
some of the more popular wine booths. At these events, it
is regarded as common courtesy to
harvest your wine sample and step back from the table to
take it for a test drive, allowing
others to obtain their pour. If you wish to question the
winemaker or marketing rep, they will
usually be happy to step to the side to answer your query.
To many people, the restaurant food booths, not the wine,
are the primo feature at the
Grand Tasting. Most restaurants are intent on putting their
best foot forward and make
a great effort to showcase their skills with innovative
and spectacular food samples.
Unless you're wearing an 8-armed octopus atop your head
(an outfit that would attract
nary a second glance there) to juggle food and wine samples;
you can probably forget trying to
match a particular wine with a restaurant's food; it's simply
hopeless.
SFW&CF major domo, Greg O'Byrne, aided and abetted by
the behind-the-scenes Lisa
Sanderson, do a terrific job, year in and year out, attracting
major food and wine figures to
Santa Fe.
For winemakers (unless they're from the Southern hemisphere),
it requires a major
commitment to do SFW&CF; it occurs right in the midst
of crush. So, if the winemaker seems to
have a cell phone glued to his ear, it's because he's keeping
atop his duties on the home front.
The seminars are probably the most informative aspect of
SFW&CF. It can often present a
chance to taste a vertical collection (wines from multiple
years) of a particular wine.
Dick Ponzi, one of the pioneers of Pinot Noir in Oregon,
will be presenting a selection of
his Pinots, dating back to his early days in the 1970's.
The seminars often present a once-in-a-life time opportunity.
One such this year is the
Champagne Henriot. In addition to tasting their full portfolio
of Champagnes, the attendees
will be able to sample the still wine components that go
into their blends; an unprecedented
event for New Mexico.
One of the most striking revolutions, food-wise, in this
country over the last ten years
has been the resurgence of interest in cheesemaking. Artisinal
cheeses are being made that are
every bit as good and unique as any in the world.
Much impetus to this movement has been provided by the books
on artisinal American cheeses
by author Laura Werlin of San Francisco. Her seminar will
focus on the black art (at least to me)
of ideal matches between cheese and wine, assisted by Santa
Fe's Maitre d'Fromage Kim Muller.
When I teach my cheese appreciation class in Los Alamos,
I am continually amazed at the
dramatic impact a seemingly innocuous cheese can have on
the taste of a wine, sometimes positive,
sometimes negative. Werlin attributes much of this to the
enzymatic content of the cheese.
Finally, another seminar that particularly attracted my
attention was the Santa Barbara Pinot
Noirs. My tasting group has a pool on how many minutes (seconds?)
into the seminar it will be
before the movie "Sideways" is mentioned.
Even without the movie's focus on Pinots, enthusiasts have
long recognized that Santa Barbara
Pinots are as good as any produced anywhere in the world.
Bruno D'Alfonso, winemaker at
Sanford Winery and a member of the seminar panel, has been
doing it for years. In the last few
years, the Pinots from the very cool Santa Rita Hills have
garnered much attention for their
intensity and perfume. With three Santa Rita Hills wineries
being represented, this seminar will
provide a unique opportunity to try those wines.
So.... if you're walking through downtown Santa Fe next
week and hear lots of yammering
about "terroir", "brett", "clones",
and "saignee"; not to mention purple teeth and
lips and
a slightly glazed countenance.... that would be the folks
indulging in the SFW&CF.
The SFW&CF starts on Wednesday, Sept.21 and runs through
Sunday. Detailed information
and ticket orders can be found at www.SantaFeWineandChile.org
or 438-8060.
_________________________
TomHill, a White Rock resident, transports neutrons and
wields an epee in real life.
Wine, Its Distribution, The Law and Other Absurdities
With the repeal of the "Noble Experiment" (which
had some not-so-noble consequences) known
as Prohibition in the 21st Amendment, power for regulating
alcoholic beverages within their
boundaries was ceded to each state. This has resulted in
a mind-boggling patchwork of laws
and directives that vary widely from state to state. In
this column, we will examine some
of these laws, absurd or sensible, particularly as they
apply to New Mexico.
After Repeal, most states established an agency to regulate
alcohol, with a three-tier
system for its distribution. The three-tier system has wine
(and beer and liquor) distributors
who buy from the source (wineries or importers or distillers),
who sell to the retail businesses
(wine stores and restaurants), who then sell to the consumer.
In some states, particularly back East, it was the bootleggers,
whose distribution system
was already in place, who segued into the distributor role.
Such was not the case, to my
knowledge, in New Mexico.
The three-tier system works very well, in most states, at
efficiently collecting taxes for the
state, and getting a case of Sutter Home White Zin to Mom
& Popp's Fine Wine Shoppe
in Dexter.
Many wine aficionados decry the inefficiencies of the three-tier
system and regard
the distributors as evil middle men. I am not one of those.
What they do (collect taxes and
distribute wine), they do very well. In point of fact, in
New Mexico, you can usually buy wines
directly at retail cheaper than you can buy them at full
retail from the wineries. Buying wines
locally is always my preferred mode.
The problem with the wine distributors in nearly all states
is that they enjoy a state-mandated
monopoly, free of competition. You can buy Mondavi Fume
Blanc from only one distributor, at
whatever price they may dictate. If you're interested in
buying the very obscure Chateau Arpy
le Cent Pointe out in the boondocks; you are, in most states,
